|
|
I Was a Sunday-School Spy
How are these accounts different from the original written accounts? None of the original accounts in the New Testament
say anything about Jesus being nailed to the cross.
When confronted with this, almost all of the participants were surprised.
Why the difference in the modern-day written accounts versus the original
written accounts?
-
People today are fundamentally different probably not to that level
-
Not an important aspect of the crucifixion therefore, left out in
original accounts. If this is true, then why is it emphasized so much today
and why did every modern-day writer include it?
-
Neglected to include it. How can this be true for all four original
accounts (presuming they were from different writers), while none of the
modern-day accounts neglected to include it?
-
Some of the original accounts may have been based on hearsay and not
personal witness. True but all of the modern-day accounts are
based on hearsay.
Is
it possible the word-of-mouth perceptions of the crucifixion are different from
the original event?
|
|